E-ISSN 2791-9439 | ISSN 1300-1868

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.  

Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavour.  Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation is helped by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include*:

  • The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
  • The submitted work should be original and should not have been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the concerns about text-recycling (‘self-plagiarism’).
  • A single study should not be split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (i.e.  ‘salami-slicing/publishing’).
  • Concurrent or secondary publication is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. Examples include: translations or a manuscript that is intended for a different group of readers.
  • Results should be presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation (including image based manipulation). Authors should adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting and processing data.
  • No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (‘plagiarism’). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks (to indicate words taken from another source) are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions secured for material that is copyrighted.

         Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.

  • Authors should make sure they have permissions for the use of software, questionnaires/(web) surveys and scales in their studies (if appropriate).
  • Authors should avoid untrue statements about an entity (who can be an individual person or a company) or descriptions of their behavior or actions that could potentially be seen as personal attacks or allegations about that person.
  • Research that may be misapplied to pose a threat to public health or national security should be clearly identified in the manuscript (e.g. dual use of research). Examples include creation of harmful consequences of biological agents or toxins, disruption of immunity of vaccines, unusual hazards in the use of chemicals, weaponization of research/technology (amongst others).
  • Authors are strongly advised to ensure the author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors are all correct at submission. Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted. Reasons for changes in authorship should be explained in detail. Please note that changes to authorship cannot be made after acceptance of a manuscript. 

*All of the above are guidelines and authors need to make sure to respect third parties rights such as copyright and/or moral rights.

Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results presented. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc. Sensitive information in the form of confidential or proprietary data is excluded.

If there is suspicion of misbehavior or alleged fraud the Journal and/or Publisher will carry out an investigation following COPE guidelines.  If, after investigation, there are valid concerns, the author(s) concerned will be contacted under their given e-mail address and given an opportunity to address the issue. Depending on the situation, this may result in the Journal’s and/or Publisher’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to:

  • If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.
  • If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction:
  1. an erratum/correction may be placed with the article
  2. an expression of concern may be placed with the article
  3. or in severe cases retraction of the article may occur. 

The reason will be given in the published erratum/correction, expression of concern or retraction note. Please note that retraction means that the article is maintained on the platform, watermarked “retracted” and the explanation for the retraction is provided in a note linked to the watermarked article.

  • The author’s institution may be informed
  • A notice of suspected transgression of ethical standards in the peer review system may be included as part of the author’s and article’s bibliographic record.

Fundamental errors

Authors have an obligation to correct mistakes once they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article. The author(s) is/are requested to contact the journal and explain in what sense the error is impacting the article. A decision on how to correct the literature will depend on the nature of the error. This may be a correction or retraction. The retraction note should provide transparency which parts of the article are impacted by the error.

Suggesting / excluding reviewers

Authors are welcome to suggest suitable reviewers and/or request the exclusion of certain individuals when they submit their manuscripts. When suggesting reviewers, authors should make sure they are totally independent and not connected to the work in any way. It is strongly recommended to suggest a mix of reviewers from different countries and different institutions. When suggesting reviewers, the Corresponding Author must provide an institutional email address for each suggested reviewer, or, if this is not possible to include other means of verifying the identity such as a link to a personal homepage, a link to the publication record or a researcher or author ID in the submission letter. Please note that the Journal may not use the suggestions, but suggestions are appreciated and may help facilitate the peer review process. 


Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

The fact that all manuscripts are reviewed through Blind Review has a direct influence on the publication quality. This process ensures confidentiality by objective and independent review. The review process at Ekonomik Yaklasim is carried out on the principle of double blind review. Reviewers do not contact the authors directly, and the reviews and comments are conveyed through the journal management system. In this process, the reviewer views on the evaluation forms and full texts are assigned to the author(s) by the editor. Therefore, the reviewers doing review work for Ekonomik Yaklasim are supposed to bear the following ethical responsibilities:

Reviewers must

  • agree to review only in their subject of expertise.
  • review in an unbiased and confidential manner.
  • inform the editor of the journal if they think that they encounter conflict of interests and decline to review the manuscript during the review process.
  • dispose the manuscripts they have reviewed in accordance with the principle of confidentiality after the review process. Reviewers can use the final versions of the manuscripts they have reviewed only after publication.
  • review the manuscript objectively and only in terms of its content and ensure that nationality, gender, religious and political beliefs, and economic apprehension do not influence the review.
  • review the manuscript in a constructive and kind tone, avoid making personal comments including hostility, slander and insult.
  • review the manuscript they have agreed to review on time and in accordance with the ethical rules stated above.


Ethical Responsibilities of Publisher

Ekonomik Yaklasim Association, publisher of Ekonomik Yaklasim, is a non-profit civil society organization. Ekonomik Yaklasim Association is conscious of the fact that they must observe the ethical responsilities below and act accordingly:

  • Editors are responsible for all the processes that the manuscripts submitted to Ekonomik Yaklasim will go through. Within this framework, ignoring the economic or political interests, the decision-makers are the editors.
  • The publisher undertakes to have an independent editorial decision made.
  • The publisher protects the intellectual property rights of all the articles published in Ekonomik Yaklasim and holds the responsibility to keep a record of each unpublished article.
  • The publisher bears all the responsibility to take the precautions against scientific abuse, fraud and plagiarism.


Unethical Behaviour

Should you encounter any unethical act or content in Ekonomik Yaklasim apart from the ethical responsibilities listed above, please notify the journal by e-mail at eyaklasimeditor@gmail.com.

Most Viewed Articles
  • Ulusların Düşüşü - Güç, Zenginlik ve Yoksulluğun Kökenleri
    Why Nations Fail - The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty [Turkish]
    Gönül DİNÇER
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2014; 25(93): 65-76
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.35517

    Dostoevsky’s Approach to Economics and Critique of the Economic Man [Turkish]
    Ceyhun GÜRKAN, Mustafa ÖZİŞ
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2012; 23(82): 99-128
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.20004

    Effects of Budget Deficit on Current Account Balance: Analysis of Twin Deficits Hypothesis in Case of Turkey [Turkish]
    Metin BAYRAK; Ömer ESEN
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2012; 23(82): 23-49
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.20001

    An Empirical Analysis on the Relationship between Public Sector Size and Economic Growth in Turkey [Turkish]
    Ömer Faruk ALTUNÇ, Celil AYDIN
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2012; 23(82): 79-98
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.20003

    NAIRU Estimation for the Turkish Economy [Turkish]
    Özlem YİĞİT; Atilla GÖKÇE
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2012; 23(83): 69-91
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.34098

  • Most Downloaded
  • Küresel Dengesizlikler ve Kriz Tartışması Işığında Cari Denge ve Sermaye Hesabını Anlamak
    Understanding Developments in Current Accounts and Financial Flows in Light of Discussions on Global Imbalances and Recent Crises [Turkish]
    Hasan Cömert, Güney Düzçay
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2015; 26(96): 59-90
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.35901

    English Title Not Available [Turkish title: TEKNOLOJi TRANSFERi VE GELiŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERiN REKABET GÜCÜ] [Turkish]
    Refik ÜREYEN, Metin DURGUT, Müfit AKYOS, Oğuz KARAKOÇ
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2003; 14(47 - Proceedings): 69-92
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.10379

  • Uluslararası Finansal Krizler
    English title is not available [Turkish title: Uluslararası Finansal Krizler] [Turkish]
    Veysel Çalışkan
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2003; 14(49 - Proceedings): 225-240
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.10403

    English Title Not Available [Turkish Title:XVII. YÜZYILDA OSMANLILAR VE MERKANTİLİSTLER] [Turkish]
    Mehmet BULUT
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2000; 11(39): 23-35
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.10334

  • Sürdürülebilirlik Üzerine Tarihsel ve Güncel Bir Perspektif
    A Historical and Current Perspective on Sustainability [Turkish]
    Hüseyin Şen, Ayşe Kaya, Barış Alpaslan
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2018; 29(107): 1-47
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/ey.39101

  • Most Cited Articles
  • [Türkçe Başlık Yok]
    Jülide Yıldırım Öcal, Nadir Öcal
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2004; 15(52-53): 131-141
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.10503
    Cited : 17 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Sürdürülebilirlik Üzerine Tarihsel ve Güncel Bir Perspektif
    A Historical and Current Perspective on Sustainability [Turkish]
    Hüseyin Şen, Ayşe Kaya, Barış Alpaslan
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2018; 29(107): 1-47
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/ey.39101
    Cited : 11 times [Click to see citing articles]

    The Impact of Investment Incentives on Regional Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis [Turkish]
    Nuri YAVAN
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2011; 22(81): 65-104
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.20018
    Cited : 9 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Türkiye'de İklim Değişikliğinin Buğday Verimi Üzerine Etkileri: Bir Heterojen Panel Çalışması
    Impacts of Climate Change on Wheat Yield in Turkey: A Heterogeneous Panel Study [Turkish]
    Ozan Eruygur, Selin Özokcu
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2016; 27(101): 219-255
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.35944
    Cited : 9 times [Click to see citing articles]

    English Title Not Available [Turkish Title:İKİZ AÇIKLAR HİPOTEZİ (TÜRKİYE UYGULAMASI)] [Turkish]
    Ahmet ZENGİN
    Ekonomik Yaklasim. 2000; 11(39): 37-67
    » Abstract & References » doi: 10.5455/ey.10335
    Cited : 8 times [Click to see citing articles]